Upton & Hatfield is committed to serving the legal needs of New Hampshire
towns, village and school districts, and other public agencies. We provide
prompt and cost-effective services that draw on the decades of experience
gained representing towns in New Hampshire since 1908.
Upton & Hatfield has represented many of our municipal clients for
decades. We believe these long-term relationships are one of the strongest
indicators of our ability to represent municipal clients professionally
and efficiently.
We practice in all areas of municipal law, including issues involving the
Right to Know Law; labor and employment; zoning and land use; budget and
financial management; highways; town meetings; property taxation and abatement;
warrants and articles; sewer, water, and utility systems; bankruptcy;
civil rights litigation; general liability matters; and insurance coverage.
Although our firm has an extensive litigation practice, we take great
pride in our ability to help towns avoid the costs and risks of litigation
whenever possible.
We have an excellent track record representing
towns, school districts, and municipalities in state and federal courts, the Board of Tax and Land Appeals, and before
state and federal administrative agencies. Some of our recent decisions
before the New Hampshire Supreme Court include:
Polonsky v. Town of Bedford, ___N.H.____ (2020) (Supreme Court held statutory procedures for sale
of tax deeded property under RSA 80:89 are unconstitutional. The Legislature
will now need to revisit the statute).
Union Leader and ACLU v. Town of Salem, ___N.H.___ (2020) (Town successfully resisted plaintiff’s demand
for information under the right to know law at the trial court. On appeal,
the Supreme Court reversed 25 years of precedent, concluding that personnel
investigatory files are not categorically exempt under the right to know
law. The case is now on remand at the trial court to engage in a balancing
test of the public and private interests involved.)
Cady v. Town of Deerfield, 169 N.H. 578 (2017) (this case addressed the right of the deliberative
session of the Town Meeting to amend warrant articles.)
Russell Forest Management, LLC v. Town of Henniker, 162 N.H. 141 (2011) (this case upheld the Town’s decision to not
permit development on a discontinued highway.)
Crowley v. Town of Loudon, 162 N.H. 768 (2011) (this case upheld the Board of Selectmen’s
decision not to layout a public highway.)
Dow v. Town of Effingham, 148 N.H. 121 (2002) (this case explores a wide variety of subjects, including
the power of town meetings and governing bodies to adopt general ordinances
in the interests of the public’s health, safety and welfare.)
Upton & Hatfield is a general practice law firm with an extensive municipal
practice. Our experience in both the public and private sectors helps
us to better serve our municipal clients in specialized areas such as
bankruptcy, insurance, and employment.
“I was very fortunate to have Upton & Hatfield represent me. Could not of asked for a better experience. I highly recommend using Upton & Hatfield. A++”